TE -rote's - Nov 7 Replying to @echotels you have no right to refuse to date someone who belongs to the gender(s) you are attracted to solely bc of what's in their pants. this sort of exclusion is transphobic and invalidates our gender identities. On...
TE -rote's - Nov 7 Replying to @echotels you have no right to refuse to date someone who belongs to the gender(s) you are attracted to solely bc of what's in their pants. this sort of exclusion is transphobic and invalidates our gender identities. On TH Qa fo I oc s Nov 7 27 is it okay to have preferences? yes! but communication is key! make your preferences clear so we understand that you view is for who we are and just aren't into something. LL gob Qs & I oc ots - Nov 7 v BUT also understand that there are ways to do sexual things with people that aren't strictly penetrative sex. even if a certain activity isn't to your liking, chances are you can find something that is. D1 1 Qa fio! I : - hotels - Nov 7 wv | hate that this needs to be repeated but sexuality is dependent on gender, NOT what's in someone's pants. including trans people in your sexuality is not a preference, it's a duty. O1 4 Oa & To cote - Nov 7 v one more thing: it's fetishization to only like someone bc of what's in their pants and if you do that you're fucking disgusting, seeya 1% je! Qs &O
Please Note: All OCR text is automatically generated by a script utilising Tesseract, as a result errors are to be expected. If there are any particularly egregious errors that need manual intervention, you may contact us at this address.
← Back to gallery